<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hand Crank vs Power Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/27/hand-crank-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/27/hand-crank-windows/</link>
	<description>steam trains, bluegrass music, low-tech solutions, and hi-tech problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 03:08:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Low-Tech Times &#8250; DANGER: Automatic Locks</title>
		<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/27/hand-crank-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>The Low-Tech Times &#8250; DANGER: Automatic Locks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/27/hand-crank-windows/#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>[...] See Also: Hand Crank vs Power Windows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See Also: Hand Crank vs Power Windows [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Low-Tech Times &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Scoble vs. Bly</title>
		<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/27/hand-crank-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>The Low-Tech Times &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Scoble vs. Bly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 01:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/27/hand-crank-windows/#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>[...] unnecessary hi-tech devices is not lazy; on the contrary, insisting on a button to roll up and down car windows is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unnecessary hi-tech devices is not lazy; on the contrary, insisting on a button to roll up and down car windows is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. P. Gass</title>
		<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/27/hand-crank-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>S. P. Gass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/27/hand-crank-windows/#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>Krister, your son may be on to something!  I used to have a 1971 F100 and I still miss it to this day.  The reverse gear didn&#039;t work so I had to be careful not to park in downhill-facing spots.  After the F100, I bought a &#039;64 Ford Falcon with hand-cranks windows (that&#039;s the picture above), but I need to get the car running again after some squirrels chewed the spark plug wires.  

Thanks for your comment and have a great day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krister, your son may be on to something!  I used to have a 1971 F100 and I still miss it to this day.  The reverse gear didn&#8217;t work so I had to be careful not to park in downhill-facing spots.  After the F100, I bought a &#8217;64 Ford Falcon with hand-cranks windows (that&#8217;s the picture above), but I need to get the car running again after some squirrels chewed the spark plug wires.  </p>
<p>Thanks for your comment and have a great day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

