<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CDs vs Vinyl Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/29/cds-vs-vinyl-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/29/cds-vs-vinyl-records/</link>
	<description>steam trains, bluegrass music, low-tech solutions, and hi-tech problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:22:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Low-Tech Times &#8250; Weekend Links</title>
		<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/29/cds-vs-vinyl-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>The Low-Tech Times &#8250; Weekend Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/29/cds-vs-vinyl-records/#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>[...] CDs vs Vinyl Records       This was written by admin. Posted on Friday, October 21, 2011, at 8:31 pm. Filed under hi-tech gadgets and addictions, low tech links, low-tech solutions / alternatives. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CDs vs Vinyl Records       This was written by admin. Posted on Friday, October 21, 2011, at 8:31 pm. Filed under hi-tech gadgets and addictions, low tech links, low-tech solutions / alternatives. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Low-Tech Times &#8250; Digital Music</title>
		<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/29/cds-vs-vinyl-records/comment-page-1/#comment-2286</link>
		<dc:creator>The Low-Tech Times &#8250; Digital Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/29/cds-vs-vinyl-records/#comment-2286</guid>
		<description>[...] See Also: The Unnecessary iPod (or Why I Do Not Own an iPod) CDs vs Vinyl Records [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See Also: The Unnecessary iPod (or Why I Do Not Own an iPod) CDs vs Vinyl Records [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/29/cds-vs-vinyl-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/01/29/cds-vs-vinyl-records/#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>Andy K, thanks for your comment.  I don&#039;t think you&#039;re alone.  I admit digital sound can sound full/complete.  Obviously that&#039;s all that many people listen to.  But if you have records, getting a record player is a wise move.  So many people just have a bunch of records in their basement or closet that never get played.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy K, thanks for your comment.  I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re alone.  I admit digital sound can sound full/complete.  Obviously that&#8217;s all that many people listen to.  But if you have records, getting a record player is a wise move.  So many people just have a bunch of records in their basement or closet that never get played.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

