<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hi-Tech vs Low-Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/11/24/hi-tech-vs-low-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/11/24/hi-tech-vs-low-tech/</link>
	<description>steam trains, bluegrass music, low-tech solutions, and hi-tech problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:10:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: S.P. Gass</title>
		<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/11/24/hi-tech-vs-low-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>S.P. Gass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/11/24/hi-tech-vs-low-tech/#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>Mike B., thanks for your thoughts.  I have yet to get into the eBook thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike B., thanks for your thoughts.  I have yet to get into the eBook thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Brown</title>
		<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/11/24/hi-tech-vs-low-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-1736</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowtechtimes.com/2008/11/24/hi-tech-vs-low-tech/#comment-1736</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on all but #1. Books, and by association - magazines and newspapers, consume huge resources... both in their creation and distribution. Image the savings to the world&#039;s energy requirements and destruction if you could ban paper!

But, alas, I too love a good book, with photos and the feel of good quality paper - but I&#039;ve collected more electronic books than paper lately and no longer buy newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on all but #1. Books, and by association &#8211; magazines and newspapers, consume huge resources&#8230; both in their creation and distribution. Image the savings to the world&#8217;s energy requirements and destruction if you could ban paper!</p>
<p>But, alas, I too love a good book, with photos and the feel of good quality paper &#8211; but I&#8217;ve collected more electronic books than paper lately and no longer buy newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
