<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Truth About CFLs Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowtechtimes.com/2009/08/15/the-truth-about-cfls-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2009/08/15/the-truth-about-cfls-part-2/</link>
	<description>steam trains, bluegrass music, low-tech solutions, and hi-tech problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:22:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.P. Gass</title>
		<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2009/08/15/the-truth-about-cfls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>S.P. Gass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowtechtimes.com/2009/08/15/the-truth-about-cfls-part-2/#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Havoc for providing your thoughts.

My county has a special bin for them at the transfer station, but I bet you are right that most people don&#039;t dispose of them properly.  After the poor performance of a few CFLs, I&#039;ve been buying incandescent replacements.  I totally agree with you about the quality of the light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Havoc for providing your thoughts.</p>
<p>My county has a special bin for them at the transfer station, but I bet you are right that most people don&#8217;t dispose of them properly.  After the poor performance of a few CFLs, I&#8217;ve been buying incandescent replacements.  I totally agree with you about the quality of the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Havoc</title>
		<link>http://lowtechtimes.com/2009/08/15/the-truth-about-cfls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Havoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowtechtimes.com/2009/08/15/the-truth-about-cfls-part-2/#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got generally bad things to say about CFL&#039;s. First they just don&#039;t have the same comforting warm glow, the warm glow that says &quot;home&quot; rather than &quot;public bathroom.&quot; 

Second, they may be less susceptible to damage from vibration (think garage lights, etc) but they are more fragile in general. I&#039;ve dropped a few incandescent bulbs while changing them, and haven&#039;t had to get out the dustpan and broom all that often. Compared to CFL&#039;s, you&#039;ll be cleaning up broken glass every time one gets dropped. 

Which brings me to my final point, CFL&#039;s contain mercury, and in fact, the box even says that discarded CFL bulbs should be handled appropriately, and where I live (Montgomery County, MD) they are even considered Hazardous Material, and are not to be disposed of in your regular trash.  And don&#039;t even think of getting out the vacuum cleaner for broken CFL&#039;s, nor should you use a broom. Both methods can stir up dust which contains mercury. Some boxes inform you that should one break, you should wipe the area up with a damp cloth. 

That being said, how many people do you think are properly disposing of CFL bulbs? I&#039;m willing to bet not a whole lot. Meaning as the use of CFL&#039;s becomes more common, we&#039;ll have a whole lot more mercury collecting in landfills. Also, most people probably don&#039;t clean up broken CFL&#039;s properly, leading to elevated levels of mercury in your own home. You know, the place where you spend most of your time. Studies show that long term exposure to mercury is a very bad thing. 

My verdict on CFL&#039;s: Very bad news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got generally bad things to say about CFL&#8217;s. First they just don&#8217;t have the same comforting warm glow, the warm glow that says &#8220;home&#8221; rather than &#8220;public bathroom.&#8221; </p>
<p>Second, they may be less susceptible to damage from vibration (think garage lights, etc) but they are more fragile in general. I&#8217;ve dropped a few incandescent bulbs while changing them, and haven&#8217;t had to get out the dustpan and broom all that often. Compared to CFL&#8217;s, you&#8217;ll be cleaning up broken glass every time one gets dropped. </p>
<p>Which brings me to my final point, CFL&#8217;s contain mercury, and in fact, the box even says that discarded CFL bulbs should be handled appropriately, and where I live (Montgomery County, MD) they are even considered Hazardous Material, and are not to be disposed of in your regular trash.  And don&#8217;t even think of getting out the vacuum cleaner for broken CFL&#8217;s, nor should you use a broom. Both methods can stir up dust which contains mercury. Some boxes inform you that should one break, you should wipe the area up with a damp cloth. </p>
<p>That being said, how many people do you think are properly disposing of CFL bulbs? I&#8217;m willing to bet not a whole lot. Meaning as the use of CFL&#8217;s becomes more common, we&#8217;ll have a whole lot more mercury collecting in landfills. Also, most people probably don&#8217;t clean up broken CFL&#8217;s properly, leading to elevated levels of mercury in your own home. You know, the place where you spend most of your time. Studies show that long term exposure to mercury is a very bad thing. </p>
<p>My verdict on CFL&#8217;s: Very bad news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

